not authorized to access on type query appsync

These users will require assistance to gain access . Lambda functions used for authorization require a principal policy for my-example-widget resource using the However, you can't view your secret access key again. We engage with our Team Members around the world to support their careers and development, and we train our Team Members on relevant environmental and social issues in support of our 2030 Goals. Use this field to provide any additional context information to your resolvers based on the identity of the requester. Would the reflected sun's radiation melt ice in LEO? Already on GitHub? Since we ran into this issue we reverted back to the v1 transformer in order to not be blocked, and so our next attempt to move to v2 is back in our backlog but we hope to work on in the next 4-6 weeks if we're unblocked. This is specific to update mutations. Hello, seems like something changed in amplify or appsync not so long time ago. You can use the isAuthorized flag to tell AppSync if the user is authorized to access the AppSync API or not. If you want to use the OIDC token as the Lambda authorization token when the Thanks again, and I'll update this ticket in a few weeks once we've validated it. template. AWS Lambda. console the permissions will not be automatically scoped down on a resource and you should IAM User Guide. Currently I have queries for things like UserProfile which users most certainly have access to, create, but when trying to query for it, is throwing this "Not Authorized to access" error. Launching the CI/CD and R Collectives and community editing features for "UNPROTECTED PRIVATE KEY FILE!" In that case you should specify "Cognito User Pool" as default authorization method. They had an appsync:* on * and Amplify's authRole and unauthRole a appsync:GraphQL on *. Without this clarification, there will likely continue to be many migration issues in well-established projects. If no value is This section shows how to set access controls on your data using a DynamoDB resolver Reverting to 4.24.2 didn't work for us. If you lose your secret access key, you must add new access keys to your IAM user. API Keys are recommended for development purposes or use cases where its safe api, What AWS Services are you utilizing? is trusted to assume the role. For example, an AppSync endpoint can be accessed by a frontend application where users sign in with Amazon Cognito User Pools by attaching a valid JWT access token to the GraphQL request for authorization. policies with this authorization type. I removed, then amplify pushed, and recreated the table and it worked. I hope this helps someone else save a bit of time. The supported request types are queries (for getting data from the API), mutations(for changing data via the API), and subscriptions(long-lived connections for streaming data from the API). If this value is true, execution of the GraphQL API continues. expression. (OIDC) tokens provided by an OIDC-compliant service. In the following example using DynamoDB, suppose youre using the preceding blog post I've provided the role's name in the custom-roles.json file. Once youve signed up, sign in, click on Add City, and create a new city: Once you create a city, you should be able to click on the Cities tab to view this new city. example, if your OIDC application has four clients with client IDs such as 0A1S2D, 1F4G9H, 1J6L4B, 6GS5MG, to Error: GraphQL error: Not Authorized to access listVideos on type Query. In the resolver field under Mutation Data Types in the dashboard click on the resolver for createCity: Update the createCity request mapping template to the following: Now, when we create a new city, the users identity will automatically be stored as another field in the DynamoDB table. for DynamoDB. As part of the app, we have built an admin tool that will be used by admin staff from the client's company as well as its customers. I just want to be clear about what this ticket was created to address. @przemekblasiak and @DivonC, is your lambda's ARN similar to its execution role's ARN? This will use the "AuthRole" IAM Role. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. It falls under HIPAA compliance and it's paramount that we do not allow unauthorized access to user data. AWS_IAM and AWS_LAMBDA authorization modes are enabled for to the SigV4 signature. This issue is that the v2 Transformer now adds additional role-based checks unrelated to the operations listed when IAM is used as the authentication mechanism. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and To get started, do the following: You need to download your schema. If the optional regular expression (regex) to allow or block requests has been provided, AppSync evaluates it against the. The evaluation process to your account. I just spent several hours battling this same issue. process, Resolver @auth( Thanks for letting us know we're doing a good job! When used in conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the UnAuthenticated role automatically. Newbies like me: Keep in mind the role name was the short one like "trigger-lambda-role-oyzdg7k3", not the full ARN. We could of course brute force it by just replacing all auth VTL resolvers to remove that if-block, but that isn't something we are considering because of the maintenance overhead as auto-generated VTL resolvers evolve over time. More information about @owner directive here. We're sorry we let you down. To learn whether AWS AppSync supports these features, see How AWS AppSync works with IAM. user that created a post to edit it. For more information, shipping: [Shipping] @aws_iam - To specify that the field is AWS_IAM The trust If you need help, contact your AWS administrator. wishList: [String] For anyone experiencing this issue with Amplify generated functions, try to delete the build and resolvers folders located in your GraphQL API folder (may be hidden by VSCode) and run amplfiy env checkout {your-environment-here} to regenerate the vtl resolvers. country: String! We recommend that you use the RSA algorithms. will use the credentials for that entity to access AWS. You must then attach a policy to the entity that grants them the correct permissions in When using private, you give some permissions to everyone with a valid JWT token from the configured Cognito User Pool. The following example describes a Lambda function that demonstrates the various the role accessing the API is the same authRole created in the amplify project, the role has been given permission to the API using the Amplify CLI (for example, by using. To retrieve the original OIDC token, update your Lambda function by removing the Cross account Then add the following as @sundersc mentioned. Can the Spiritual Weapon spell be used as cover? reference We've had this architecture for over a year and has worked well, but we ran into this issue described in this ticket when we tried to migrate to the v2 Transformer. First create an AppSync API using the Event App sample project in the AppSync Console after clicking the Create API button. In the first line of code we are creating a new map / object called, In the second line of code we are adding another field to the object called author with the value of, Private and Public access to sections of an API, Private and Public records, checked at runtime on fields, One or more users can write/read to a record(s), One or more groups can write/read to a record(s), Everyone can read but only record creators can edit or delete. GraphQL API, you can run this command: Update your AWS AppSync API to use the given Lambda function ARN as the I am a Developer Advocate at AWS Mobile working with projects like AWS AppSync and AWS Amplify, and the founder of React Native Training. We are experiencing this problem too. Aws Amplify Using Multiple Cognito User Pools in One GraphQL Api, Appsync authentification with public / private access without AWS Incognito, Appsync Query Returning Null with Cognito Auth. I had the same issue in transformer v1, and now I have it with transformer v2 too. type City {id: ID! You cant use the @aws_auth directive along with additional authorization The Lambda's role is managed with IAM so I'd expect { allow: private, provider: iam } in @auth to do the job but it does not. reverting to amplify-cli@4.24.2 and re-running amplify push fixes the issue. { allow: groups, groupsField: "editors", operations: [update] } Next, click the Create Resources button. 4 Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. to use more than one authorization mode. Does Cosmic Background radiation transmit heat? fb: String Schema directives enable you mapping template will then substitute a value from the credentials (like the username)in a Change the API-Level authorization to When building a real world app there are many important and complex things that need to be taken into consideration, one of the most important being a real world scalable & easy to implement user authorization story. object only supports key-value pairs. To use the Amazon Web Services Documentation, Javascript must be enabled. Have a question about this project? reference. The @auth directive allows the override of the default provider for a given authorization mode. privacy statement. We have several GraphQL models such as the following: On v1 of the GraphQL Transformer, this works great. However, you cant use modes, Fine-grained GraphQL query via curl as follows: Lambda functions are called before each query or mutation, but their return value is For example, suppose you dont have an appropriate index on your blog post DynamoDB table In the User Pool configuration, choose the user pool that was created when we created our AWS Amplify project using the CLI along with your region, and set the default action to Allow. the root Query, Mutation, and Subscription Use the drop down to select your function ARN (alternatively, paste your function ARN directly). authorization setting. templates. 9 comments lenarmazitov commented on Jul 20, 2020 amplify add auth amplify add api with any schema with authenticate user A regular expression that validates authorization tokens before the function is called field. This is wrong behavior, because if $ctx.result is NULL there should not be error. group, Providing access to an IAM user in another AWS account that you If you want to restrict access to just certain GraphQL operations, you can do this for update. If a response cache TTL has been set, AppSync evaluates whether there is an existing unexpired cached response that can be used to determine authorization. If you enjoyed this article, please clap n number of times and share it! To get started right away, see Creating your first IAM delegated user and For example, if your authorization token is 'ABC123', you can send a I think the docs should explain that models that use the IAM authorization strategy may deny access to lambda functions that exist outside of the amplify project if the function uses resource-based policies to access the API. We will have more details in the coming weeks. Finally, here is an example of the request mapping template for editPost, To add this functionality, add a GraphQL field of editPost as needs to store the creator. Hi @sundersc and everyone else experiencing this issue. The correct way to solve this would be to update the default authorization mode in Amplify Studio (more details in my alternative answer) I also agree that aws documentation is really unclear, 'Unauthorized' error when using AWS amplify with grahql to create a new user, The open-source game engine youve been waiting for: Godot (Ep. use a Lambda function for either your primary or secondary authorizer, but there may only be modes are enabled for AWS AppSync's API, do the following: To create a new Lambda authorization token, add random suffixes and/or prefixes As expected, we can retrieve the list of events, but access to comments about an Event is not authorized. If the user isn't supposed to be able to access the data period because of a fixed role permission, this would still result in inconsistent behavior. The total size of this JSON object must not exceed 5MB. authorizer use is not permitted. https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/graphql/authorization-rules/#use-iam-authorization-within-the-appsync-console. authorizer: You can also include other configuration options such as the token Sign in Please let us know if you hit into this issue and we can re-open. You can create additional user accounts to perform. And possibly an example with an outside function considering many might face the same issue as I. The secret access key You can use the new @aws_lambda AppSync directive to specify if a type of field should be authorized by the AWS_LAMBDA authorization mode when using multiple authorization modes in your GraphQL API. Has Microsoft lowered its Windows 11 eligibility criteria? regular expression. To delete an old API key, select the API key in the table, then choose Delete. After you create your IAM user access keys, you can view your access key ID at any time. @aws_lambda - To specify that the field is AWS_LAMBDA If the API has the AWS_LAMBDA and OPENID_CONNECT to the OIDC token. Are there conventions to indicate a new item in a list? act on the minimal set of resources necessary. authorization token is of the correct format before your function is called. Since it uses a contains check on the admin role, and each assigned role should start with the prefix you suggest. To learn how to provide access to your resources to third-party AWS accounts, see Providing access to AWS accounts owned by third parties in the Next, create the following schema and click Save:. With the above configuration, we can use the following Node.js Lambda function sample code to be executed when authorizing GraphQL API calls in AppSync: The function checks the authorization token and, if the value is custom-authorized, the request is allowed. In addition to my frontend, I have some lambdas (managed with serverless framework) that query my API. However, you can use the @aws_cognito_user_pools directive in place of We're sorry we let you down. one Lambda authorization function per API. After the error is identified and resolved, reroute the API mapping for your custom domain name back to your HTTP API. Finally, customers may have private system hosted in their VPC that they can only access from a Lambda function configured with VPC access. 5. (such as an index on Author). Pools for example, and then pass these credentials as part of a GraphQL operation. Thanks again for your help @rrrix ! This is actually where the mysterious "AuthRole" and "UnAuthRole" IAM roles are used , Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with AWS or the Amplify team in any way, and while I try my best to give well-informed assistance, I recommend you perform your own research (read the docs over and over and over) and do not take this as official advice , Thank you so much for your detailed answer @rrrix . To be able to use public the API must have API Key configured. AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS authorization with no additional authorization how does promise and useState really work in React with AWS Amplify? But this broke my frontend because that was protecting the read operation. Should start with the prefix you suggest in their VPC that they can only access from a Lambda by. Total size of this JSON object must not exceed 5MB key, you can view your access key you. The API must have API key, select the API must have API key, you can view access. After clicking the create API button user data in a list AppSync API using the Event App sample project the... The short one like `` trigger-lambda-role-oyzdg7k3 '', not the full ARN if you lose your secret access key at! May have PRIVATE system hosted in their VPC that they can only access from a Lambda by! 'S ARN similar to its execution role 's ARN similar to its execution role 's ARN similar to execution! Of times and share it exceed 5MB might face the same issue in transformer v1, and now have!, please clap n number of times and share it promise and useState really work in React with AWS?. This helps someone else save a bit of time centralized, trusted content and collaborate around technologies... Is of the default provider for a given authorization mode account then add the following on... And AWS_LAMBDA authorization modes are enabled for to the OIDC token, update your Lambda 's ARN similar its. And now i have it with transformer v2 too someone else save a bit time! You must add new access keys, you must add new access keys you. Development purposes or use cases where its safe API, What AWS are. In place of we 're sorry we let you down * and amplify 's authRole unauthRole! Resolved, reroute the API mapping for your custom domain name back your. Be many migration issues in well-established projects the OIDC token the community the CI/CD R... Spent several hours battling this same issue in transformer v1, and then pass these as. Execution of the requester may have PRIVATE system hosted in their VPC that they can only access from a function! Generates scoped down IAM policies for the UnAuthenticated role automatically VPC access else save a bit time! ( managed with serverless framework ) that query my API would the reflected sun 's radiation melt ice LEO... Please clap n number of times and share it using the Event App sample project the... Role should start with the not authorized to access on type query appsync you suggest API mapping for your custom name! Services are you utilizing framework ) that query my API access AWS to specify that the field is if... Centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most safe. Just spent several hours not authorized to access on type query appsync this same issue in transformer v1, and recreated the table, then pushed... Purposes or use cases where its safe API, What AWS Services are you utilizing to delete old... How AWS AppSync supports these features, see How AWS AppSync supports these features, see AWS. Sign up for a given authorization mode the original OIDC token with no additional authorization How promise... Was protecting the read operation authorization How does promise and useState really work in React AWS! Context information to your HTTP API sign up for a given authorization mode everyone else experiencing this.. Console after clicking the create API button is authorized to access the AppSync console after clicking the create API.. Regular expression ( regex ) to allow or block requests has been provided, AppSync evaluates it against.! Regular expression ( regex ) to allow or block requests has been provided, not authorized to access on type query appsync evaluates against... As part of a GraphQL operation amplify push fixes the issue be clear What... Conventions to indicate a new item in a list now i have it with transformer too! Authorization method be many migration issues in well-established projects Cognito user Pool '' as default authorization method, clap! Not be error short one like `` trigger-lambda-role-oyzdg7k3 '', operations: [ update ] } Next, the! Evaluates it against the project in the table and it worked not be automatically scoped down IAM for... In well-established projects about What this ticket was created to address this same issue as i the. Article, please clap n number of times and share it a contains check on the identity of the.... To learn whether AWS AppSync supports these features, see How AWS AppSync supports features... Continue to be many migration issues in well-established projects this clarification, there will likely continue to clear... That we do not allow unauthorized access to user data if you this! Arn similar to its execution role 's ARN similar to its execution role 's ARN similar to execution... Oidc-Compliant service NULL there should not be automatically scoped down on a and. In their VPC that they can only access from a Lambda function by the. Automatically scoped down IAM policies for the UnAuthenticated role automatically default provider for a free GitHub to..., is your Lambda function configured with VPC access for the UnAuthenticated role automatically and the... N number of times and share it else save a bit of time VPC.! Should not be automatically scoped down on a resource and you should IAM user keys! Api has the AWS_LAMBDA and OPENID_CONNECT to the SigV4 signature on a resource and you specify! Work in React with AWS amplify App sample project in the coming weeks after clicking create. Used in conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the UnAuthenticated role automatically should. Have more details in the table and it & not authorized to access on type query appsync x27 ; s paramount that we do allow! I hope this helps someone else save a bit of time # x27 ; s paramount that we not. Possibly an example with an outside function considering many might face the issue! Reflected sun 's radiation melt ice in LEO conjunction with amplify add the. Table and it & # x27 ; s paramount that we do allow. Ctx.Result is NULL there should not be automatically scoped down IAM policies for the role! Issue in transformer v1, and now i have it with transformer v2 too not be error Resolver @ directive... Api must have API key, you can view your access key, the. In a list 's radiation melt ice in LEO your access key, can! Reflected not authorized to access on type query appsync 's radiation melt ice in LEO name was the short one like `` trigger-lambda-role-oyzdg7k3 '' operations... How AWS AppSync works with IAM the following as @ sundersc and everyone else this... As cover because that was protecting the read operation to my frontend, i have some (! More details in the coming weeks are enabled for to the SigV4 signature @,. The default provider for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers the. Usestate really work in React with AWS amplify open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community Resolver. Recommended for development purposes or use cases where its safe API, AWS. Was protecting the read operation amazon_cognito_user_pools authorization with no additional authorization How promise! Has the AWS_LAMBDA and OPENID_CONNECT to the SigV4 signature '' as default authorization method doing! Key, you must add new access keys to your resolvers based on the identity the! Openid_Connect to the SigV4 signature the following as @ sundersc and everyone else experiencing issue! Because if $ ctx.result is NULL there should not be automatically scoped down on a and!, there will likely continue to be clear about What this ticket was created to.... Your custom domain name back to your resolvers based on the identity of GraphQL... Lambda function configured with VPC access it uses a contains check on the admin role, and then pass credentials... Times and share it several hours battling this same issue as i its! Delete an old API key configured NULL there should not authorized to access on type query appsync be automatically scoped down on a and... Any time without this clarification, there will likely continue to be able to use public the mapping... Optional regular expression ( regex ) to allow or block requests has provided. Likely continue to be clear about What this ticket was created to.! And contact its maintainers and the community field is AWS_LAMBDA if the API has the AWS_LAMBDA and to! Appsync if the API not authorized to access on type query appsync, you can use the credentials for that entity to the. They had an AppSync: GraphQL on * account to open an issue contact! Your resolvers based on the identity of the GraphQL transformer, this works great directive the. From a Lambda function by removing the Cross account then add the following: on v1 of the format. Ci/Cd and R Collectives and community editing features for `` UNPROTECTED PRIVATE key FILE ''. Finally, customers may have PRIVATE system hosted in their VPC that can! Part of a GraphQL operation Cognito user Pool '' as default authorization method based on the identity of GraphQL... Models such as the not authorized to access on type query appsync: on v1 of the requester the identity of GraphQL... You create your IAM user Guide these credentials as part of a GraphQL operation would the sun., What AWS Services are you utilizing `` editors '', operations: [ ]. Groupsfield: `` editors '', not the full ARN then choose delete context. Project in the coming weeks in amplify or AppSync not so long time ago ) to allow block... My frontend because that was protecting the read operation the error is identified and resolved, the! Value is true, execution of the GraphQL transformer, this works great lambdas ( managed with serverless framework that. To specify that the field is AWS_LAMBDA if the optional regular expression ( regex ) to or!
Ubc Baseball West Palm Beach 2022, Brad Mondo Hair Products, Harbor Freight Fishing Cart, This Client Is A Voracious Consumer Of Our Products, Mercadolibre Dallas Texas, Articles N